They’re at it again! – Efforts to Repeal Obamacare

There’s a new attempt to un-do the Affordable Care Act (ACA) going on in D.C. It’s disguised as an attempt to reform the law, but make no mistake, this proposed change will take us backward in time.
This time proponents say it should be up to the states to decide which health benefits should be offered. They want to allow insurers to charge older plan members (that’s people somewhere around age 50) 5-7 times more than they charge younger members. They suggest High Risk pools for folks with pre-existing conditions. (Did you know that  a pre-existing condition could be something as seemingly simple as eczema?)
 

What’s the matter with letting states decide such matters?

The problem with all these ideas is that once again care will not be available to people who need it. It’s a move right back to where we were before the ACA was passed.
 
What benefits are likely to get dumped? Maternity care and mental health benefits are right up there on the list. Both can be very expensive. Both need to have a large pool of premium-payers in order for insurance companies to offer them. When they are optional benefits, insurers only offer them on their most expensive policies (we saw that before the ACA in California). Far too many people who need such care cannot afford to purchase the policies that offer coverage for it.
 
Not intending enter the controversy over abortion or to say anything about the pros and cons of abortion accessibility, I must note that when maternity care is not affordable, more women find their options for continuing a pregnancy limited. The abortion rate is more likely to go up.
 
We know that lack of mental health care raises the risk of homelessness, violence, and the use of emergency room care for conditions that could have been prevented with stable housing, food, and employment. Cutting out that benefit would again take us backward in time.
 
We’ve also tried High Risk pools in the past. The ones we had pre-ACA were limited in the number of people who could be covered, had annual limits on the amount of care they would pay, and were much more expensive than regular policies. A return to that will not help reduce the cost of care or access to care for people with pre-existing conditions.
 
Much of what the GOP is now proposing is simply a return to what we had before the ACA was passed. It’s being presented as a way to fix Obamacare. Don’t be fooled. It won’t fix the problems with the ACA / Obamacare. It will take out basic protections and ultimately make health insurance more expensive. It will also result in much larger numbers of uninsured people.

 

Contact your representatives in Congress.

Let them know that the Affordable Care Act does not need to be reversed or repealed. It needs to be fixed, but not by going back to the way things were before March 2010 when the ACA was passed. And don’t take your eyes off what’s going on in D.C. They think we might not notice what’s happening if they just change a few things here or there and call it returning control to state and local governments.

 

A Benefit in the National Interest

Health care and health insurance are topics of national interest, governed at the national level for the vast majority of Americans through Medicare, the VA, Medicaid, and employer-based insurance programs. Let’s not let anyone take protection away from the small number of other of Americans who have so recently received the benefits of comprehensive coverage. Good health and access to care are truly fundamental to making America a great place to live, work, and raise our families.
Did you like this? Share it:

Policy Renewal Time Approaches

Mark-your-calendar-clip-artAvoid Hassles and Heartburn – Start Early to Renew or Change Individual Health Insurance Plans

1.       Update your contact information. Covered California, “the Exchange,” will be sending out policy renewal and change information in October. If you have moved or changed other contact information let your agent know before September 30. You can also do it yourself directly online through Covered California. Be sure to let your insurance company know of any changes as well.

2.       Renew your Permission to Verify Income. You can’t get a subsidy from Covered California if the State cannot verify your income. Permission has to be renewed periodically. Check with your agent to be sure your permission is up to date or go directly to Covered California and do it yourself.

3.       Do you want to keep your doctor? Know your provider options. Different insurance plans contract with different doctors. Plans outside of Covered California may have the same provider networks as those on the Exchange. However, some of the older plans and group plans may have different networks. Be sure to check with your doctor’s office to confirm that they take Covered California insurance plans.

4.       Check with your agent about individual plans that are not subsidized as part of Covered California if your subsidy is going to be small or if your income is above the subsidy range. But be careful. Some of the plans outside Covered California can have less expensive premiums up front but be more expensive faster when care is needed than the standard plans on the Exchange.

For questions or help anywhere in California call Kathy Pozos at 831-713-6438 or email KathyPozos2000@gmail.com

On Covered California, look for Kathleen Brewer de Pozos as agent. (The only agent at Covered California with that last name!)

Did you like this? Share it:

Renewal Time Is Here

calendar3-240x240We’ve now entered Renewal season for existing health insurance policies. Open enrollment for people new to Covered CA doesn’t start until November 1, but those with existing policies can make any necessary changes and renew their policies now.

Has anything changed in your life or income? A new member of the family? A child who is no longer a dependent? Have you moved? Did you get a raise? Did your income go down? Did you get a new job or lose a job? If there have been changes we’ll need to open a Change Report and enter the new information into the system that way. If there will be changes for next year, but things haven’t changed for this year, we report that by beginning the renewal process directly.

Once all information has been entered, you can select your policy for next year. Some of the carriers have new types of policies and premiums will be quite different. However, for those who have subsidized policies, the out-of-pocket share does not seem to be going to go up too much. That share is still based primarily on  household income.

There is one new carrier in our Central Coast market area, United Healthcare. Many Dignity doctors are on their network provider list. They don’t seem to have a contract with PAMF at this time. Other independent providers are also in their PPO network.

If you want to get a sense of what your premium might be before making any changes, I’ve found the Shop and Compare tool at www.Coveredca.com works with Chrome or Internet Explorer better than with Firefox. I haven’t tried it with Safari.

This year Pozos Insurance Services also offers Aflac supplemental policies that can enhance your protection by providing benefits to fill some of the gaps in traditional health insurance policies. Accident, disability, hospitalization, cancer, dental, and vision supplemental policies are available to groups and individuals. We also offer life insurance.

As always, if you have questions or need help with selecting or managing your policy or Covered California account, or if you’d like to know more about life insurance or Aflac options, please contact us. We’re happy to help you with these important decisions about protection for you and your family.

Did you like this? Share it:

Mom “Forced Into Medicaid” A Blessing in Disguise?

Washington Apple Health logo

Nicole Hopkins’ opinion piece in the November 21, 2013 issue of the Wall Street Journal is headlined, “ObamaCare Forced Mom Into Medicaid“. Ms. Hopkins, a resident of Brooklyn, NY, describes her mother’s situation as a low-income resident of western Washington state and suggests that the opening of Medicaid to low-income adults such as her mother is actually a form of oppression that snuffs out personal dignity and systematizes “learned helplessness”. Granted, her mother is angry that she was not given the option to purchase a policy on the state marketplace, but the assumption that continuing to spend well over 25% of her income on a catastrophic, bare-bones insurance policy is a better use of her limited resources bears a closer look. It may be that in the long run, this change in the way her health care needs are financed will be recognized as one of those proverbial “blessings in disguise” about which we sometimes hear.

The Story In Brief

Ms. Hopkins’ mother is 52 years old. She is looking for regular work that would provide employer-sponsored health insurance but has been unable to find any. She works as a substitute para-educator in the local school district. Her current income is below the federal poverty line (FPL) — her daughter notes in the article that her mother has long known that she qualified for Medicaid (Washington Apple Health) in Washington state, though as an able-bodied adult without children under the age of 18 she might not actually have been able to get that coverage.

Mother has a long history of supporting herself and her children. She was easily able to purchase health insurance for the entire family from her income when the children were young. Once the children were grown, she tried a career change, becoming a licensed real estate agent. As many other self-employed people discovered during the Great Recession, paying clients proved too few and far between to cover expenses. In 2011 she gave up her license and began looking for other ways to support herself. (No unemployment benefits for the self-employed who don’t get enough clients.) Work as a substitute teacher was available and she took it. She is self-motivated, determined to make her own way in life, not asking for any hand-outs: a woman who lives out the American ideal of the self-sufficient, independent, “fully functioning member of society”.

For the past two years, she has purchased an insurance policy for $269 per month that covers catastrophic health care needs. Such policies typically have high deductibles, offer little access to regular medical care, don’t provide coverage for brand name prescriptions or services such as maternity or newborn care, and before the Affordable Care Act (ACA) could include annual and lifetime limits on claims payments made. For the coming year, the premium for a new policy that will be compliant with the ACA’s requirements will cost $415.20. If we assume Mother’s income is under $957.50 per month (FPL) since she has been income-qualified for help for the past couple of years, the premium she has been paying takes a minimum of 28% of her monthly income. The ACA deems premiums greater than 8-9.5% of monthly income to be unaffordable. The new premium, at over 43% of her income, is out of the question.

Going to the Marketplace

Washington is one of the 14 states that have set up their own insurance marketplace. The website is working reasonably well, as is typical of the sites set up by the individual states. Mother was able to create her account, enter her particular information, and find her options for health insurance. The shock came when she discovered that she was eligible for Medicaid and that no other policy outside of Washington Apple Health was open for her to purchase.

She was mortified. In her experience as a middle-class woman, accepting help from the larger community (i.e., federal and state governments) is shameful. The notion of a social safety-net that is available for everyone during times of need is hard to accept, especially when one is first confronted with the reality that he or she is truly  experiencing a time of need. Since the belief system under which most Americans live, whether religious or not, is based on the Calvinist notion that our financial success or failure is a reflection of whether we are in good-standing with God or not, being poor is seen as reason for negative judgement from our fellow citizens.These judgements are not necessarily conscious, but having a low income or being “poor” leaves people stigmatized.

Certainly some people are poor because they have made unwise choices in their lives, but others have followed all the rules, done everything “right” and still been unable to move into a comfortable middle-class life. “Falling” into poverty from the middle-class is very hard to swallow.

How Could This Have Happened?

Ms. Hopkins notes that Mother was always able to provide insurance for herself and her children and blames the ACA for making insurance unaffordable now. This is a common and very understandable reaction. After all, what 52 year old woman needs maternity and newborn coverage? Those with children under 19 may need pediatric dental insurance, but still … And so the ACA’s Essential Health Benefits get blamed for the cost of insurance.

What most people outside of the insurance industry have not seen is the degree to which the price of health care and the price of health insurance have increased over the past 20-30 years at a much faster rate than inflation. Additionally, they don’t see the difference in premium that is based on age of the insured.

When Mother was younger, her insurance was much less expensive in real dollars and as a percent of family income. Additionally real income was higher. (Wages have not kept up with inflation over the years.) Policies all included high cost services such as maternity and newborn coverage. Most had reasonable deductibles and copayments, so families could get care as needed. As the cost of care skyrocketed, policies became more restrictive in terms of benefits in hopes of keeping premiums affordable in both the individual and small group markets.

Most Americans got (and continue to get) their insurance through their employers or the federal government (Medicare, the Veterans Administration, and military benefits). The cost of their insurance has increased, but not as dramatically as that for individuals and small-business owners and employees. The risk pools for the latter are too small to provide the cost savings that can be obtained through larger pools.

In California, where I am licensed, in one region the cost of a minimum coverage policy similar to the catastrophic policy Mother has in Washington, but including all newly required benefits and deductible maximums, varies in price on the marketplace from a low of $194 per month at age 25 to a high of $580 per month at age 64. At age 45 it would cost $279 and by age 55 it jumps to $431. These prices seem similar to what Ms. Hopkins is reporting as the price for a new policy from her mother’s current insurer. Insurers must offer identical policies and identical pricing both on and off the marketplace exchanges, so the policy is likely to be similar to a minimum coverage or perhaps a Bronze policy on the Washington marketplace.

The addition of maternity and newborn coverage is not the primary issue in the increased cost of health insurance. When risk is spread more broadly, it costs less for each person who pays for a part of it. In California, all policies in the state have included such coverage since July 1, 2012 because the cost of not having this coverage in policies had become prohibitive. Women without maternity insurance (over 40% of insured California women who became pregnant) had been covered through Medi-Cal (our Medicaid program). Prices for policies have gone up with the coming of the ACA, but not because they include maternity and newborn care.

And What to Do …

The most important thing Ms. Hopkins and her mother can do at this moment is to stop and take a deep breath.

Sometimes great blessings hide in what seem to be awful realities. Mother is not more poor today than she was a week ago. In fact, as of January 1, 2014, she will be $269 per month richer, and she will have a comprehensive medical insurance program with little or no regular out-of-pocket cost. If Mother is unable to bring herself to use her Washington Apple Health coverage, she does not have to do so. But neither will she have to pay for a policy that does not actually protect her.

Will Mother choose to use her new health care options? That is not a question anyone else can answer. She is approaching an age (55-64) at which insurance premiums skyrocket and many Americans have found themselves priced out of the market. At the same time, she has reached the age at which screening tests for deadly diseases begin showing positive results and lives are saved by early interventions. Tests such as mammograms, PAP smears, bone density screening, and colonoscopies are typically ordered for people in their early 50s. These tests are not inexpensive. Prior to the ACA, patients often had to pay for them through their deductibles.

The ACA treats screening exams as preventive care and as such they are not subject to deductibles or copays. Health insurance policies pay for them in full. Medicaid treats them the same way. Mother will not be forced to submit to these exams, but she would be well-advised to get them. They save lives and prevent much suffering for individuals and their families.

What might Mother do with her new-found wealth? If Mother does not have a well-funded retirement portfolio and truly does have enough money to meet her monthly needs, perhaps she and Ms. Hopkins could look at ways to set aside the $269 per month into a savings or retirement plan. Alternatively, if she is not comfortable keeping the money herself, she could donate it to a charity of her choice. However, if she does not have money in a liquid savings account, she should hold on to it and build up her reserves for “rainy days” that might yet come.

When her fortunes turn around and she gets more work, higher paying work, or employer-sponsored health insurance, she can simply report to Washington Apple Health that she no longer needs their health plan. At 138% FPL, she will be able to go to the marketplace and purchase a policy for which she herself pays the premium. Unless her income is greater than 400% of FPL, she will be well advised to accept a bit more help in the form of cost sharing reductions and/or advanced premium tax credits (subsidies). But that’s another issue for another day. Until then, qualifying for Medicaid may turn out to be a huge blessing in disguise.

 

Did you like this? Share it: